The WhyTry Program Contact Us Conpany Information
topbar
menu_left menu_right
menu
Training



The 2nd Annual WhyTry National Conference
July 29th - 30th, 2010 - Plano, TX


Facilitator Training
Sign-up now for one of our next 2-day Training events.



Provo, UT March 11th-12th, 2010
Boise, ID March 11th -12th, 2010
Tumwater, WA March 11th -12th, 2010
Rogers, AR March 15th -16th, 2010
San Diego, CA March 22nd - 23rd, 2010
Savannah, GA March 22nd -23rd, 2010
Peoria, IL March 23rd -24th, 2010
Lansing, MI March 29th-30th, 2010
Kansas City, MO March 29th-30th, 2010
Denver, CO April 1st - 2nd, 2010
Columbus, OH April 12th - 13th, 2010
Conroe, TX April 15th - 16th, 2010
Grand Rapids, MI April 20th - 21st, 2010
Chattanooga, TN April 21st - 22nd, 2010
Gastonia, NC April 22nd - 23rd, 2010
Spokane, WA April 22nd - 23rd, 2010
Holbrook, AZ April 26th - 27th, 2010
Yakima, WA April 29th -30, 2010
Eugene, OR April 29th -30, 2010
Dallas, TX May 5th - 6th, 2010
Lexington, KY May 6th - 7th, 2010
Fort Wayne, IN May 10th -11th, 2010
Toledo, OH May 13th -14th, 2010
St. Louis, MO May 24th - 25th, 2010
Watertown, NY (CALL) July 14th - 15th, 2010


Hands-on Activity Training Opportunities . . . Don't miss these events!
Syracuse, NY April 7th-8th 2010
Denver, CO April 29th-30th 2010
Lansing, MI June 17th-18th 2010
Phoenix, AZ June 24th-25th 2010
Boise, ID August 23rd-24th 2010

(More to be announced soon!)



comments
"Many (of our) counselors have collected data on changes in student behavior and school performance. The positive results are impressive.
I give Christian Moore and the Why Try program my highest recommendation. . ."


Dawn Kay
Utah State Office of Education


Read More
 
WhyTry Recommended Assessments: Conners’ Rating Scales-Revised (CRS-R)

Measure of AD/HD and Externalizing Behaviors
Conners’ Rating Scales-Revised (CRS-R)
Author: C. Keith Conners, PhD

For more information or to order the CRS-R click here

This is an instrument that uses teacher (ages 3-17), caregiver (ages 3-17), and self-report (ages 12 – 17) ratings to aid in the assessment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder(AD/HD) and evaluate problem behavior in children and adolescents

  • Measures inattention and hyperactivity through routine screening.
  • Provides perspective of child’s behavior from those who interact with child on daily basis.
  • Establish baseline prior to beginning intervention and monitor effectiveness of treatment over time.
  • Provides valuable structured and normed information to further support conclusions, diagnoses, and treatment decisions when reports from all individuals are combined.
  • Long form and short form are available for parents, teachers, and self-report.
  • The long form for parents has 80 items and includes the following scales: oppositional, cognitive problems/inattention, hyperactivity, anxious/shy, perfectionism, social problems, psychosomatic, Conners’ global index, DSM-IV symptom subscales, AD/HD index.
  • The short form for parents has 27 items and includes the following scales: oppositional, cognitive problems, hyperactivity, and AD/HD index.

There are three versions of the CRS-R: 1- Parent - 2 - Teacher - 3 - Adolescent Self-Report (All of these are available in short and long form).

This assessment is often used in:

  • Schools
  • Mental Health Clinics
  • Residential Treatment Centers
  • Pediatric Offices
  • Juvenile Detention Facilities
  • Child Protective Agencies
  • Outpatient Facilities

The assessment is administered to:

  • Parent form - for students ages 3 – 17
  • Teacher form – for students ages 3 – 17
  • Self-report form – for students ages 12 – 17 Form

The measure is administered with pencil and paper and is hand scored.

Qualifications for administration of the CRS-S:

Bachelor’s degree in a program that included course work principles in measurement and in the administration and interpretation of tests.

Cost:

  • $425 per complete kit including manual - this includes:
    • 25 feedback forms for each of the Parent long forma, Parent short form, Teacher long form, Teacher short form, Self report long form, Self-report short form, Parent AD/HD DSM-IV scales, Teacher AD/HD DSM-IV scales, Self-report AD/HD DSM-IV scales, 25 Global Index-Teacher Forms, 25 Global Index-Parent Forms, 15 CRS-R Treatment Progress Color Plot, and 100 Teacher Information Forms
  • $26 per 25 Quick Score forms (specify test and version);
  • $22 per feedback forms (specify test and version)
  • $46 per technical manual
  • $40 per user's manual
  • $45 per Windows preview version including 3 administrations/interpretive reports, and user’s manual
  • $10 per computer interpretive report
  • $4 per computer profile report

Psychometric Properties

Based on a sample of 3,000 + children ages 3 to 17 representative of males and females and minorities.

Norms for the Parent rating scales tend to over represent Caucasian families and under represent African American families.

Norms for teacher scales are racially proportional

Norms for the adolescent scales are over representative of African American families.

Has face validity. According to Hess (2004), the CRS-R has face validity meaning that this measure appears to measure what it is supposed to measure. The items in this measure appear to be a good translation of the construct.

Reliability is stable for scores when to assessing the individual at a given time and the changes that might occur in an individual over time.

There is very little information in the manual regarding concurrent validity and predictive with other assessments. There is one reference to a study with the Children’s Depression Inventory. Concurrent validity is the measure or operational definition’s ability to distinguish between groups that it is supposed to distinguish between. In this case, this measure should be able to distinguish between those diagnosed with AD/HD and those diagnosed with Bipolar disorder. Predictive validity is the measurement’s ability to theoretically predict something that it should theoretically be able to predict.

There is high internal consistency among the items, which is a measurement of how well the items reflect the same construct and yield the same results.

No interrater reliability coefficients are reported. This means that there are no statistics on the consistency of raters observations on these scales. This poses a serious omission for the psychometric properties.

More information can be obtained from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/tests/crs-r.htm
Conners’ Rating Scales Revised. (n.d.). In The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook.
Retrieved September 16, 2008, from EBSCOHost Mental Measurements Yearbook database.